We now save and load layer and channel item sets. Only missing set types are path ones, but the whole path item is just its own exception in the XCF format, and adding support for it, while keeping compatibility with older XCF seem like a small headache. I could do it, but I actually wonder if it is worth it. Would people really need to store sets of paths? Also this commit finally gets rid of any remnant of the old item "link" concept (I think), so we are getting close to merging the branch. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| app-docs.sgml | ||
| app-overrides.txt | ||
| app-sections.txt | ||
| app.types | ||
| Makefile.am | ||
| meson.build | ||