Update contact page
Prefer references to Forgejo, more relevant to users
Updates to Getting Started Pages / FAQ
- a lot of content was outdated and generally rewritten or rephrased
- implement procedure for size limits as determined by annual assembly
2023, see Codeberg-e.V./Discussion#92
- people are sometimes confused wheter you need to be a paying member in
Codeberg e.V. in order to use the platform
Update improving Codeberg guides
- reduce redundancy in code contribution guide and reference the
Contributing Issue Tracker instead
- separate (and ideally more appealing) donation page (deserves even
more love IMHO)
- shorten and strip outdated information
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Documentation/pulls/394
Reviewed-by: Panagiotis "Ivory" Vasilopoulos <git@n0toose.net>
Co-authored-by: Otto Richter <git@otto.splvs.net>
Co-committed-by: Otto Richter <git@otto.splvs.net>
Based on social media feedback regarding Forgejo's documentation
not always covering everything. Although it is probably best to use
the Forgejo documentation wherever possible, it is probably in the
interest of our users to link back to both sites.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Documentation/pulls/323
In Codeberg/Design #39 the idea was thrown around to put some links
under a new dropdown and prominently link to the docs instead.
This rewrites the docs index page and adds some more information on how
to get started, as well as adds some other tweaks to **communication
methods** and gives a new explanation of **what Codeberg is**.
Co-authored-by: fnetX <git@fralix.ovh>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Documentation/pulls/158
Co-authored-by: Otto Richter <fnetx@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Otto Richter <fnetx@noreply.codeberg.org>
