/** * ========================================================================= * File : qpc.cpp * Project : 0 A.D. * Description : Timer implementation using QueryPerformanceCounter * ========================================================================= */ // license: GPL; see lib/license.txt #include "precompiled.h" #include "qpc.h" #include "lib/sysdep/os_cpu.h" #include "lib/sysdep/os/win/win.h" #include "lib/sysdep/os/win/wutil.h" // wutil_argv #include "pit.h" // PIT_FREQ #include "pmt.h" // PMT_FREQ LibError CounterQPC::Activate() { // note: QPC is observed to be universally supported, but the API // provides for failure, so play it safe. LARGE_INTEGER qpcFreq, qpcValue; const BOOL ok1 = QueryPerformanceFrequency(&qpcFreq); const BOOL ok2 = QueryPerformanceCounter(&qpcValue); WARN_RETURN_IF_FALSE(ok1 && ok2); if(!qpcFreq.QuadPart || !qpcValue.QuadPart) WARN_RETURN(ERR::FAIL); m_frequency = (i64)qpcFreq.QuadPart; return INFO::OK; } void CounterQPC::Shutdown() { } bool CounterQPC::IsSafe() const { // note: we have separate modules that directly access some of the // counters potentially used by QPC. disabling the redundant counters // would be ugly (increased coupling). instead, we'll make sure our // implementations could (if necessary) coexist with QPC, but it // shouldn't come to that since only one counter is needed/used. // the PIT is entirely safe (even if annoyingly slow to read) if(m_frequency == PIT_FREQ) return true; // the PMT is generally safe (see discussion in CounterPmt::IsSafe), // but older QPC implementations had problems with 24-bit rollover. // "System clock problem can inflate benchmark scores" // (http://www.lionbridge.com/bi/cont2000/200012/perfcnt.asp ; no longer // online, nor findable in Google Cache / archive.org) tells of // incorrect values every 4.6 seconds (i.e. 24 bits @ 3.57 MHz) unless // the timer is polled in the meantime. fortunately, this is guaranteed // by our periodic updates (which come at least that often). if(m_frequency == PMT_FREQ) return true; // the TSC has been known to be buggy (even mentioned in MSDN). it is // used on MP HAL systems and can be detected by comparing QPF with the // CPU clock. we consider it unsafe unless the user promises (via // command line) that it's patched and thus reliable on their system. bool usesTsc = IsSimilarMagnitude(m_frequency, os_cpu_ClockFrequency()); // unconfirmed reports indicate QPC sometimes uses 1/3 of the // CPU clock frequency, so check that as well. usesTsc |= IsSimilarMagnitude(m_frequency, os_cpu_ClockFrequency()/3); if(usesTsc) { const bool isTscSafe = wutil_HasCommandLineArgument("-wQpcTscSafe"); return isTscSafe; } // the HPET is reliable and used on Vista. it can't easily be recognized // since its frequency is variable (the spec says > 10 MHz; the master // 14.318 MHz oscillator is often used). considering frequencies in // [10, 100 MHz) to be a HPET would be dangerous because it may actually // be faster or RDTSC slower. we have to exclude all other cases and // assume it's a HPET - and thus safe - if we get here. return true; } u64 CounterQPC::Counter() const { // fairly time-critical here, don't check the return value // (IsSupported made sure it succeeded initially) LARGE_INTEGER qpc_value; (void)QueryPerformanceCounter(&qpc_value); return qpc_value.QuadPart; } /** * WHRT uses this to ensure the counter (running at nominal frequency) * doesn't overflow more than once during CALIBRATION_INTERVAL_MS. **/ size_t CounterQPC::CounterBits() const { // there are reports of incorrect rollover handling in the PMT // implementation of QPC (see CounterPMT::IsSafe). however, other // counters would be used on those systems, so it's irrelevant. // we'll report the full 64 bits. return 64; } /** * initial measurement of the tick rate. not necessarily correct * (e.g. when using TSC: os_cpu_ClockFrequency isn't exact). **/ double CounterQPC::NominalFrequency() const { return (double)m_frequency; }